WWW PACEAP COM INTERLOK SOFTWARE
Copy-protection that requires the user to have their software “turned on” by the vendor leaves them exposed to prolonged periods of downtime. If a company spends all of its time supporting the copy protection, then it is quite conceivable that the cost to support the copy protection will quickly exceed the cost of piracy. Copy protection must not jeopardize the stability of the operating platform or application software. Copy protection schemes that are not compatible with standard operating systems or other common applications should be avoided. Copy protection schemes that employ invasive procedures are irresponsible. But copy protection must be responsible! Let’s take a look at what it means to employ responsible copy protection. I am the software development community’s Poster Child for Responsible Software Use.īecause people illegally steal and share software, companies are entitled to take steps to make it difficult or impossible to steal their software. I do not advocate sharing software nor do I rip CDs or use Napster. I own licenses for every piece of software I use. I am all-for responsible copy protection. In the Native Gold Bundle version 3, Waves left the dongle for a new form of copy protection known as Pace Interlok ( ). ProRec has always stood behind Waves software (because it is brilliant) while exhorting them to get rid of the dongle (because it is intrusive). Suppose all of my software titles came with dongles? I would have a four-foot long chain of dongles sticking off the back of my computer, and of course they wouldn’t all work together. The second problem was that it was intrusive.
WWW PACEAP COM INTERLOK CRACKED
Cracked versions of Waves plugins were widely available on the net for years. The first problem was that it did not provide adequate copy protection. You can copy the software all you want, but if you don’t have a dongle, it won’t run.
WWW PACEAP COM INTERLOK SERIAL
The dongle has a chip in it that carries a serial number. Waves’ dongle was a device that fits onto the parallel port of the computer. The Real Storyįor years, Waves used a dongle as its mode of copy protection. The real story is more subtle, more painful, and likely to make me the audio community’s Number One Sonofabitch.
I could go on and on about the Waves sound.īecause although this is a first-rate bundle of world-class plugins, that’s not the real story here. These plugins sound great – surgical EQ, robust vintage compression, superior stereo image manipulation, fantastic “tape-style” flanging, convincing, spacious reverb, near-invisible limiting.
Waves has a reputation for offering first-class sound, and the Native Gold Bundle delivers the sonic goods. Many of the processors have been optimized to offer superior performance versus the previous versions when used on modern CPUs offering SSE extensions.Īnd of course, there’s the sound. The new version 3 processors sport a pretty new user interface, which gives them a nice, 3D look as opposed to the tired, flat, sterile look and feel of the previous versions of plug-ins. These plugins run the gamut from the practical – such as the surgical Q10 EQ – to the utterly zany – such as the totally wacked-out Enigma. Waves Native Gold bundle offers a huge host of great processors, including EQ, compression, reverb, chorus, flange, dithering, and the highly acclaimed L1+ Ultramaximizer limiter. After all, how hard is it to review a product you love? Of course I offered to do the review, and I figured it’d be easy. Anyone familiar with my work knows that I am a vehement advocate of Waves’ products, and have used Waves tools on virtually every project I have ever done for the last five years.
I was asked last year to review the new 3.0 version of Waves Native Gold Bundle. Please visit the home page for our latest content. We will not be making any updates to the article. It first appeared on in March 2002, contributed by then Editor-in-Chief Rip Rowan. PLEASE NOTE: This article has been archived.
0 kommentar(er)
